Nobody, No One, and None How to Choose the Right Word

The indefinite pronouns nobody and no one are often mixed up with the pronoun none. The first two words are both singular pronouns and synonymous, but none can be either singular or plural. How to Use Nobody Nobody is an indefinite pronoun, meaning it does not refer to any particular person. It means the same thing as no person or not anyone. As an indefinite pronoun that refers to an absence, nobody also has no defined amount. Grammatically, though, it is treated as a singular noun: Nobody was there to open the door. How to Use No One No one is also an indefinite pronoun, and it means the same thing as nobody. It is usually considered more formal than nobody, which is why it is more likely to appear in writing. Noone is a common misspelling of no one, which is two words. No-one—with a hyphen—is a less common spelling, typically found in British English. How to Use None The pronoun none means not one, not any, or no persons or things. As an adverb, none means not at all or to no extent. Theres a common misconception that none can only be singular, but this has never been true. When none is the subject of a clause and refers to members of a group, it can be used with either a singular verb (None is) or a plural verb (None are). None must be followed by a singular verb only when it means not part of a whole, as in None of it is mine. Examples Nobody and no one are basically interchangeable; the main difference between the two is the degree of formality: No one is ever too old to learn something new.Nobody wants to sign up for cleanup duties. None means the same thing as not one or not any, which is why its often found in reference to groups: None of the other apples are as good as the Honeycrisp.None of the guests has any idea what to bring to the party. In the first example, none takes the plural verb are because it is used in the sense of not any (Not any of the other apples are as good as the Honeycrisp). In the second example, none takes the singular verb has because it is used in the sense of not one (Not one of the guests has any idea what to bring to the party). If youre using the word none and you arent sure if it should take a singular or a plural verb, try replacing none with not any or not one to determine in which sense its being used. Wilson Follett, the author of the style guide Modern American Usage, wrote that choosing the right verb for none is always a matter of context: The fact is that in some contexts none means not a single one, making singularity emphatic, whereas in other contexts it means no two, no few, no several, no fraction of many. In None of us is entitled to cast the first stone the singular meaning is hardly mistakable; in None of the commentators agree on the meaning of this passage the plural meaning is equally clear. None, then, is freely either singular or plural according to the sense suggested by its context. Often the number we give it makes no difference. How to Remember the Differences Nobody and no one always refer to people. If youre struggling to decide which one you should write, you can relax. Either one will do, so stick with whichever sounds best. None can refer to people or inanimate objects. This word always points to another noun or nouns in a sentence, which is why you often see the construction none of the [noun], as in: None of the guests enjoyed the meal. None is the appropriate word in this case because it points to the noun guests. Without the noun guests, the sentence would require an indefinite pronoun such as nobody or no one instead: No one enjoyed the meal. Sources Follett, Wilson.  Modern American Usage: A Guide. Hill and Wang, 1998, p. 205.Partridge, Eric.  Usage and Abusage: A Guide to Good English. W. W. Norton Company, 1997, pp. 207-208.

Conveniently Married Essay examples - 2266 Words

Conveniently Married Life in the Victorian Era was centered on marriage. Among the nobility, marriage was typically sought to increase status or wealth with a partner of their same social class. This also holds true for the middle class, along with using marriage to gain political or business alliances. The working class of the Victorian Era had more practical reasons for marrying. The marriages of the working class centered more on finding a companion that would be able to contribute to the household. Many men sought a strong woman whose talents would complement their particular trade, and increase the amount of money that was made. Marriage rarely occurred for love, although the marriage of Queen Victoria to Prince Albert was an†¦show more content†¦To marry would mean that Victoria could rid herself of her mother as palace chaperone; to marry might also mean the possibility of disagreement with a husband. Marrying Albert accomplished the political reasons, doing away with a chaperone, Victor ia’s stance that she would only marry for love, and also allayed the fears that Victoria had of marriage. As stated before, the working class men married to increase the wages of the household by marrying a woman who would be a compliment to their trade. In contrast, weavers relied on their wives’ and daughters’ labor in the task of making cloth. With the advent of the industrial revolution and with factories becoming a main source of work, wives became more crucial to contributing to the household. To supplement their husbands’ incomes, since artisans’ wives ran a small shop of their own, such as a chandler’s or a corner grocery. Weavers were different from most artisans in that they actively sought the help of their wives and children. Unlike traditional artisans, however, male weavers owed much of their sense of control and their prosperity to the family-based economy, for they could supervise, and profit from, the labor of their wives and children. The textile industry moving to factories also caused many problems with the weavers. Ralph Mather, a contemporary, alleged that the new machinesShow MoreRelatedThe Great Gatsby Summary1036 Words   |  5 PagesGatsby. This conversation is finished over tea; revisiting the days in Louisville when Jay Gatsby was Daisy’s beaux. Daisy broke off their relationship while Gatsby was at war. Daisy married Tom because of his wealth. Gatsby’s love for Daisy deepened, so he achieved a luxurious status to win her over. Gatsby then â€Å"conveniently† arranges tea at Nick’s at the same time Daisy plans to visit. Stark with embarrassment, Nick politely abandons the scene with the two old lovers, to give them a more intimate atmosphereRead MoreEssay Outline Introduction: ANT A=Attention Getter: N=Necessary Information: In â€Å"The Great700 Words   |  3 Pageslives on the island of West Egg, next door to a mysterious man named Jay Gatsby. Nick becomes friends with him and learns that Gatsby is in love with his cousin Daisy. They never married because Gatsby had to go off into the military and he was not rich enough for her, so when Gatsby was shipped overseas, Daisy married another man named Tom Buchanan. When Gatsby returns from his service and discovers this, he begins bootlegging to make enough money to try to impress her and win her over. After GatsbyRead More Chaucers Canterbury Tales - Wife of Bath - Feminist or Anti-feminist?1451 Words   |  6 Pageswhile she claims Biblical support for her views on marriage, the support that she cites is conveniently edited to suit her purposes (for example, Solomon did have 700 wives and 300 concubines -- but his appetites led to his turning away from God; and the marital relationship specified in the Bible is a reciprocal on e rather than the one-sided one she speaks of, tilted in favour of the wife -- she conveniently ignores that while the Apostel [...] / [...] bad oure housbondes for to love us weel, heRead More Feminist Perspectives in a Story of an Hour Essay example985 Words   |  4 PagesHer Time, by Ann Bail Howard, discusses the nature of the female characters in Kate Chopin’s novel’s and short stories. Howard suggests that the women in Chopin’s stories are longing for independence and feel torn between the feminine duties of a married woman and the freedom associated with self-reliance. Howard’s view is correct to a point, but Chopin’s female characters can be viewed as more radically feminist than Howard realizes. Rather than simply being torn between independent and dependantRead MoreSame Sex Marriage Should Be Granted1473 Words   |  6 Pagesdivorce rate is very high. People who get highly intoxicated and accidentally married fight their very hardest t o get a divorce and it is always, always granted to them. Maybe the high divorce rate is beginning to dilute what marriage used to mean, which is love. If a man and woman who do not care for each other at all can meet and get married in the same night, why can’t two people of the same sex who love each other get married? And while these inebriated straight couples battle for divorce, some desperateRead Moreâ€Å"Victorian society was obsessed with reputation and appearance† Compare how this idea is presented in the texts you have studied and to what extent you agree with this statement.976 Words   |  4 Pagesas a fallen women than to live life as a lie. This is seen in a similar context in Jane Eyre. Edward Rochester keeps bertha secret; he doesn’t want the embarrassment of other people knowing that this is his wife. That from a younger age he was married off to a deranged woman from Spanish town in Jamaica, this marriage was due to wealth and not because they had fallen in love, unaware of what this marriage would later on entail. He locks her up to keep her quiet and to carry on with life in a normalRead MoreAttending Wallace State Community College845 Words   |  4 Pageschocked full of experiences and events leading me here. Some are good, some bad, some even comical. The main reason for me choosing Wallace is life in general; from joining the Marine Corps and having to put off school to fight jihadis, to getting married and having kids; thereby putting school off even longer, it has put a large gap in my transition from high school to college. It has also allowed me to have a realistic view of the world which leads me to why I chose Wallace State. Those reasons areRead More`` He s Just Not That Into You Are Ben And Janine And Ben935 Words   |  4 PagesThe couples I chose to study from the movie He’s Just Not That Into You are Ben and Janine and Ben and Anna. Ben and Janine are a married couple who are not very sexually intimate. At one point in the movie, Janine states that her and Ben have not had sexual intercourse in a very long time. Their emotional intimacy is also very low because they very rarely open up to each other and their conversations are not very deep but are brief. Ben and Anna are having an extramarital affair and have very highRead MoreFrankestein by Mary Shelley836 Words   |  4 Pageseveryone was asleep Shelley had a very long nightmare about a monster that was created as she woke up the next morning she decided to write that nightmare as a story. Shelley was born in London England on august 30 1797 at the age of 19 she got married to another poet Percy Bysshe Shelley. Shelley had a passion for writing she used to write stories to her dad every night before she fell asleep. Shelley had a very hard childhood after her mother’s death. Not long after her mother died her fatherRead More Gatlinburg, Tennessee Essay992 Words   |  4 Pagesthese attractions cost $6.45 (http://www.smokymountainfun.com/camp.htm). Fun Mountain also has go-karts, but in addition it offers bumper cars, a chair lift, and places to eat. Fun Mountain is a good location for families with children, and it is conveniently located at the main intersection in Gatlinburg (http://www.reaganresorts.com/funmnt.htm). Ober Gatlinburg, one of Gatlinburg’s well-known attractions, offers skiing, ice-skating, an arcade, a Velcro wall, and bungee jumping (http://www.obergatlinburg

Airline Regulations Free Essays

AIRLINE REGULATIONS Research Paper AVSC 1220 TREVOR CARTER ID # 10524707 *The airline industry operates like the veins of the United States by pumping precious cargo throughout the country. Most *people don’t realize how different the airlines were a few decades ago. The entire industry was regulated by the government. We will write a custom essay sample on Airline Regulations or any similar topic only for you Order Now Regulation is usually considered a more socialistic liberal idea that is opposed by conservative capitalists. Although I personally believe in a government with a small limited *role* in our daily lives, I have come to the conclusion that the airline industry is a rare exception that needs to return to regulation which would benefit the airlines and the consumers in numerous ways. In the days of regulation the government had total control of routes, fares, gates and almost anything necessary to operate an airline. It also created many barriers to entry which would prevent any new start up airline. All the government would have to do is not allow them at any airports or not approve of any route application. Economists complained that regulation was inefficient so in 1978 the Airline Deregulation Act was passed allowing the free market to dictate airline prices and schedules. The following thirty years have proved this to be a terrible mistake. There are a wide range of facts when looking for the change in price of a ticket today compared to the airlines under regulation. Some say the tickets are 15* % cheaper. Others claim there is hardly a difference because one must account for the 10% travel agent fee that is avoided with today’s online booking. So there is clearly no great ticket price benefit due to deregulation. However in the past tickets were fully refundable and you could change your destination without numerous penalties. Today people scour the internet for a discounted ticket which will usually mean a few stops along the way that may not be in the general direction of their destination. Some passengers may have to fly into alternative airports to receive a discount. Southwest airlines now flies into most major airports just as the legacy airlines do, however, in Southwest’s early days they broke into the freshly deregulated industry by basing their operation out of LUV field Dallas (not Dallas Ft. Worth International Airport) and flying to locations such as Burbank, CA. The reason for this was because it is much cheaper to operate out of these airports to avoid paying high prices for gates and other airport fees. Southwest also undercut the pay scales across the board. They were the first low cost carrier. By *saving all this money they would be able to provide cheaper tickets to customers and the free market was beginning its control on the industry. This started the domino effect of airlines entering the market. *With a few major airlines doing most of the long haul flights many commuter airlines have started business with 100 seat type jets. Most people will see US Airways Express and think it is a division of US Airways; however that airplane might be one of 4 or 5 airlines that fly under the US Airways paint scheme. The air is absolutely saturated with all of these small jets. The air traffic control system *needs to be upgraded because of this. Instead of having 737’s make two or three flights a day on a short haul trip say from Philly to Buffalo, they will have these 100 seat regional jets make 5 or 6 flights a day. With fuel prices soaring this does not seem efficient. Safety of the consumer is also being endangered. For the last year or so many small regional airlines were hiring a large amount of pilots due to a shortage. The minimum flight time qualifications were dropped lower than they have ever been before. Some new hires are getting in the cockpit with as little as 300 hours. The average airline pilot has several thousand hours. With flight training declining every year due to the high cost, commercial pilots are becoming scarcer. When you add more airplanes while fewer pilots are being trained it creates a huge shortage. The Federal Aviation Administration pushed the mandatory retirement age to 65 adding 5 more years to a pilots career if he chooses to stay which many aren’t and won’t, due to the terrible state of the industry and conditions they have been working in. This is just a temporary fix that might stave off the shortage for a few years but hiring will start again and there won’t be enough pilots let alone enough experience pilots to fly all of these airplanes. Under regulation when oil quadrupled in the 70’s, the price was passed onto the consumer by raising ticket prices. This is unfortunate but it is a part of the way our economy works. Today with prices rising, the airlines will not raise prices and instead try to run other companies into the ground by lowering prices. This is not healthy competition. The airline industry lost 25 billion dollars from 2000*-2005. During that period a*irfares dropped 10* percent while 20 airlines went bankrupt. US Airways and Northwest Airlines have removed their obligation to their pension funds by pleading in *bankruptcy court that they couldn’t operate *without* do*ing so. This wiped out over 8,5*00 pilots retirement funds between the two of them. Over 7000 Delta pilots have also since lost their retirements. * Pilots have conceded roughly 25-35*% pay cuts along with losing their retirements in order to keep these airlines afloat and ensure the passenger gets a good deal on their ticket. Within the past few weeks Aloha Airlines joined the ranks and went out of business continuing the downward spiral of the airline industry specifically over the last 10 years. Delta and Northwest announced on April 14th a plan to merge which would create the largest airline in the world. There is also speculation of many more mergers and or bankruptcies to come. Mergers are a sign of these companies being better off w orking together than separate. That is certainly not the healthy competition the lawmakers of the 60’s and 70’s envisioned while forming this plan. Deregulation has lent instability to an industry which serves to make the world flatter. Maybe it would be in the broader interest if this industry went back to the era of regulation. Not that the system was flawless but at least with a guaranteed return on capital, airlines wouldn’t be forced to cut corners and compromise safety *. * There has been recent talk of law makers on Capitol Hill revisiting the regulation idea due to the horrible state of the industry. Hopefully they will work quickly and save the sinking ship before it’s too late*. SOURCES L. Smith Jr. , Fred. â€Å"Airline Deregulation. Library of Economics and Liberty 25 Nov 2008 http://www. econlib. org/library/Enc/AirlineDeregulation. html. *Barnum, John. â€Å"What Prompted Airline Deregulation 20 Years Ago? What Were the Objectives of That Deregulation and How Were They Achieved. *† Find Law Library 08/15/1998 25 Nov 2008 http://library. findlaw. com/1988/Sep/1/129304. html. *Bailey, Elizabeth E. â€Å"Airline Deregulation Confronting the Paradoxes. † Regulation: The Cato Review of Business and Government* 15, no. 3. Available online at: *http://www. cato. org/pubs/regulation/regv15n3/reg15n3-bailey. html*. *Transportation Security Administration* How to cite Airline Regulations, Papers

Globalization Through Of Knowledge Ideas â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Globalization Through Of Knowledge Ideas? Answer: Introducation Moral operating system is a guideline to deciding between what is right or wrong when making decisions involving technology. Technology has given technologists a lot of power through data that they collect. This data includes personal data that can be easily misused. Technology has enhanced globalization through transfer of knowledge and ideas. It enables access of data from any part of the world that can be used for good or evil. Technology can be used to misuse intellectual property rights, privancy, or dignity of a person or idea (Heikker, 2015). Therefore the making of technological software involves a big deal of moral decision on whether it right or wrong. The following write-up discusses how to standardize decisions using moral operating system when it cannot be quantified by numbers or equations and everyone has differing opinion on what is right and wrong. First, when the equations or numbers cannot quantify moral operating system, the decision to create and use a technology should be based on a reason to do the right thing. The technologists have a duty to follow what is right. They have to apply this moral operating framework and determine what is right or wrong when making decisions about the software they are developing on basis of what is right. The duty to do and follow the right thing requires one to a bid with existing laws, rights or policies (Sherblom, 2015). For instance, the decision to develop software that infringes intellectual property rights should not be developed. This is because the technologist has an obligation to follow what is right to others by not violating someone else rights of intellectual property. Secondly, moral operating system can be standardized by evaluating the purpose of the technology. The technologists should evaluate what the technology is doing to the end user. For instance, the technologist should not be focused to making money and protecting their own interests at the expense of users privacy and dignity. It is required that the technology serves a purpose and protects users privacy and dignity. Thirdly, technologist can use the utilitarian moral framework. The framework can be used to weigh the consequences of the choices that are to be made. The decision to be made should be the one that maximizes pleasure and minimizes pain. The technologist is then guided by the moral framework of developing software based on the positive consequences that has minimum negative consequences to end user. For instance, a technologist should make a decision that does more good to the society by working on the existing problem rather than developing software that works on a specific need by creating other problems. Lastly, moral operating system can be standardized by evaluating decision from a humanity perspective (Horowitz, 2011). This can be done by discussing the idea with someone from a different profession to get their reasoning about the idea. This will enable technologists to make decisions that are sensitive to human considerations. For instance, discussing an idea with someone from humanities profession can help a technologist make a decision that is sensitive to human considerations because of the difference in thinking about human problems. Therefore, it can be concluded that standardizing decisions using moral operating system requires thinking on bases of not what technologies can do but what they should be doing. This will ensure that technologies develop and use a lot of data that they obtain from users for the common good leading to an ethical profession. References Heikker, T. (2015). Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. by Peter-Paul Verbeek. Technology and Culture, 56(1), pp.265-267. Horowitz, D. (2011). We need a moral operating system. [video] Available at: https://www.ted.com/talks/damon_horowitz#t-958962 [Accessed 14 Sep. 2017]. Sherblom, S. (2015). A Moral Experience Feedback Loop: Modeling a system of moral self-cultivation in everyday life. Journal of Moral Education, 44(3), pp.364-381.